
Licensing process for companies & startups
We guide both established companies and startups through a clearly structured licensing process.
With tailored terms and a particular focus on founding teams where inventors are often founders themselves.

In a non-binding initial meeting
- we exchange non-confidential information on the technology, IP situation, and target markets
- we learn about your business model, goals, and needs
- we clarify whether a license model makes strategic sense, and which one
Differences:
- Companies: focus on strategic portfolio fit, time to market, and integration into existing structures
- Startups: focus on business model, team, funding situation, and the inventors' role on the founding team
A shared understanding of whether and how we continue the licensing process together.

Before exchanging sensitive information, we sign a nondisclosure agreement (NDA). A structured information exchange then follows:
- Technical information on the technology and its maturity
- Commercial data (business plan, funding needs, market entry strategy)
- IP-relevant information (patent applications, IP status, and co-ownership where applicable)
For startups in particular: we take into account that inventors are often founders themselves.
A reliable information base for due diligence, terms, and contract design.

We support due diligence from an IP and market perspective:
- IP situation: scope of protection, terms, territorial coverage, freedom to operate
- Market & competition: market potential, competitive landscape, barriers to entry
- Risks & opportunities: technological, regulatory, commercial, and financial aspects
Differences in focus:
- Companies: stronger focus on portfolio fit, synergies, and integration into existing products or structures
- Startups: stronger focus on investability, scalability, and the long-term outlook of the business model
A transparent basis for both sides to decide whether a license makes sense, and under what conditions.

Based on due diligence, we negotiate the commercial framework and capture it in a term sheet, for example:
- Upfront payments
- Milestone payments
- Ongoing royalties
Terms are calculated transparently:
- using comparables (comparable market and licensing deals)
- and an NPV model (net present value)
For companies and startups:
- A market-standard, balanced structure of upfront, milestones, and royalties
- Focus on value contribution, risk allocation, and strategic importance
Fair, market-aligned terms that are clearly calculable for companies and financeable and growth-oriented for startups.

Based on the term sheet, we draft and negotiate the license agreement in detail.
Startup-specific aspects:
- Clear rules on IP ownership, co-development, and incorporating later developments
- Contract structures that support investor compatibility
Once agreement is reached, the license agreement is signed. On request, we also support further IP strategy development (for example additional countries or applications)
A legally robust, clearly structured framework that keeps both established companies and startups actionable for the long term, and fairly involves inventors.
